Thursday, September 11, 2008

Things To Do on September 11th


9/11: a day that has been given two numbers as a signifier instead of words, as if words were inadequate. These numbers are a sign of defeat and resignation. These numbers say "what else can we call it but what it was? A day in September; September the 11th..."

It is easy for me to get emotional about 9/11 even though the physical event was thousands of miles away from me. It was not the physical but the emotional proximity to the event that struck me, that struck all of us. We never thought our empire could be so badly crippled, so terrorized, so knocked speechless and wordless and empty. Why, then, am I not shocked to hear of ravaged villages in South Ossetia and Georgia, this very week? Why, then, do I not memorialize and mourn the torture and murder of Iraqis (both in Iraq and in our own detention camps), Afghans (at the hands of a tyrannical theocratic government), Sudanese, Kenyans, Tibetans, Chinese, and on and on and on? Why are my landmarks of human injustice only those that shook my nation and my people? What evil goes on every day that I never hear about, or if I do hear, that I never care about? Why did the falling towers hurt me by proxy when other events do not? Why do only American deaths make me cry?

Things To Do on September 11th
Today I plan to read Art Spiegelman's comic book "In the Shadow of No Towers." Spiegelman wrote the great holocaust horror-comic Maus, which I recommend. In that work, Spiegelman wrestles with the fact that his father Vladek survived the Holocaust and the guilt he feels for living a relatively easy life when his father suffered so much. He considers how many dead that were taken in place of his father, and by extension, himself; in one scene Spiegelman is trying to focus on writing his comic book while his writing stand is propped up by several emaciated corpses. Spiegelman lived in New York during 9/11, and "In the Shadow of No Towers" is billed as his struggle with that horror and how it was transformed by our government into the horror(s) of Iraq (et al.), and so terror bleeds on into other terror, and on and on again.

Here are some other suggestions.

  • Listen to Philip Glass' album Solo Piano. Also, the Philip Glass piece "Opening" from Glassworks was played on NPR the day of the attacks and seemed to capture the national melancholy of that day.

  • Read Nancy Gibbs' article If You Want to Humble an Empire published in TIME Magazine on September 14, 2001. In it she details, minute by minute, the events of that day. Excerpt below:
If you want to humble an empire it makes sense to maim its cathedrals. They are symbols of its faith, and when they crumple and burn, it tells us we are not so powerful and we can't be safe. The Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, planted at the base of Manhattan island with the Statue of Liberty as their sentry, and the Pentagon, a squat, concrete fort on the banks of the Potomac, are the sanctuaries of money and power that our enemies may imagine define us. But that assumes our faith rests on what we can buy and build, and that has never been America's true God.
  • Watch The Fog of War by Errol Morris (music by Philip Glass).
  • Read Holy Sonnet 10, or "Death, be not proud" by John Donne (full text below)
Death, be not proud, though some have called thee
Mighty and dreadful, for thou art not so:
For those whom thou think'st thou dost overthrow
Die not, poor Death; nor yet canst thou kill me.
From Rest and Sleep, which but thy picture be,
Much pleasure, then from thee much more must flow;
And soonest our best men with thee do go--
Rest of their bones and souls' delivery!
Thou'rt slave to fate, chance, kings, and desperate men,
And dost with poison, war, and sickness dwell;
And poppy or charms can make us sleep as well
And better than thy stroke. Why swell'st thou then?
One short sleep past, we wake eternally,
And Death shall be no more: Death, thou shalt die!

  • Read this short piece by Jorge Luis Borges, which he wrote (I assume in the early 60s) in response to the assassination of JFK. It is titled "In Memoriam, J.F.K." (full text below)
This bullet is an old one.

In 1897, it was fired at the president of Uruguay by a young man from Montevideo, Avelino Arredondo, who had spent long weeks without seeing anyone so that the world might know that he acted alone. Thirty years earlier, Lincoln had been murdered by that same ball, by the criminal or magical hand of an actor transformed by the words of Shakespeare into Marcus Brutus, Caesar's murderer. In the mid-seventeeth century, vengeance had employed it for the assassination of Sweden's Gustavus Adolphus, in the midst of the public hecatomb of a battle.

In earlier times, the bullet had been other things, because Pythagorean metempsychosis is not reserved for humankind alone. It was the silken cord given to viziers in the East, the rifles and bayonets that cut down the defenders of the Alamo, the triangular blade that slit a queen's throat, the wood of the Cross and the dark nails that pierced the flesh of the Redeemer, the poison kept by the Carthaginian chief in an iron ring on his finger, the serene goblet that Socrates drank down one evening.

In the dawn of time it was the stone that Cain hurled at Abel, and in the future it shall be many other things that we cannot even imagine today, but that will be able to put an end to men and their wondrous, fragile life.

  • And finally, some scripture.
On this mountain the Lord of hosts will make for all peoples a feast of rich food, a feast of well-aged wine, of rich food full of marrow, of aged wine well refined. And he will swallow up on this mountain the covering that is cast over all peoples, the veil that is spread over all nations. He will swallow up death forever; and the Lord God will wipe away tears from all faces, and the reproach of his people he will take away from all the earth, for the Lord has spoken. It will be said on that day, "Behold, this is our God; we have waited for him, that he might save us. This is the Lord; we have waited for him; let us be glad and rejoice in his salvation."

-Isaiah 25:6-9

Also 1 Corinthians 15. Here is Verse 26: "The last enemy to be destroyed is death."

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thanks.

Anonymous said...

Because a few butt heads sticking panties on the head of naked prisoners and water boarding are equal to sawing someones head off while they are gurgling for their life. Or perhaps allowing an individual gut a prisoner so the dogs can eat his entrails while he is alive is similar to the horrors of "gasp" sleep deprivation. Sickening. Or maybe intentionally targeting children to willfully murder them by blowing yourself up is equal to tarnishing the Quaran in a prison sell where the prisoners get a 3 course meal. Give me a break Evan.

I do miss that Saddam guy, I mean he only willfully murdered over a million of his own citizens and dumped their bodies into mass graves. Or perhaps gasing his own citizens and funding terrorist acts in Israel. (But then again Israel is probably one of those nasty nations as well). If you think that is evil to get rid of a man like Saddam and ANYONE that supports blatant violent and hideous attacks on random citizens, then you are the one with the screwed up perspective. At least the Iraqi's may actually have a future that is 50xs more free than they ever had under an EVIL despicable man like Saddam. But then again I suppose George Bush is just as evil right?

Too bad you didn't have to dilute this post on "9/11" with your vile and disgustingly ignorant anti-American filth. Without those little "comments" this may have been a worthwhile post. As it stands it is trash and spits on what this day about which is NOT to spew your liberal garbage. Like McCain and Obama did, the day is about mourning, and trying to come together for one day. Obviously you cannot do that and have to sprinkle your disgust for America and hatred for President Bush.

-Sophia (yeah I'm not going to hide who this is)

P.S. As always you may infuriate me and I will get harsh (Like here), but I see it more as tough love.

Evan T. Burchfield said...

Soph, at first I was considering responding to your post as normal, but unfortunately your comment and its sentiment is way out of line and inappropriate. I've included several points, and though they are directed at you they are not for you; they are for others to judge for themselves. There's no arguing with you, since everyone who disagrees with you hates America and therefore doesn't deserve it.

1. "Because a few butt heads sticking panties on the head of naked prisoners and water boarding are equal to sawing someones head off while they are gurgling for their life."

I never equated terrorist executions to America's torture and mistreatment of war prisoners. I am only equating death with death, saying that the death of an Iraqi (no matter where it happens) should affect me as much as the death of an American. Human death has no national boundaries. Please do not accuse me of justifying terrorism. This is typical conservative name-calling.

Two people have been murdered in the hands of American military at Bagram. This was what I referred to when I said we should mourn Iraqi deaths, including those insurgents we kill, those people who are killed by insurgents, and those we have killed in Bagram and elsewhere.

I do not appreciate your flippant attitude towards the tortures at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay. They do not deserve to be trivialized just because there is a greater evil (such as Saddam) somewhere else in the world.

2. "...you think that is evil to get rid of a man like Saddam and ANYONE that supports blatant violent and hideous attacks on random citizens..."

I do not think it is evil to get rid of Saddam. In fact, I've stated before that I think Saddam should have been ousted decades ago. But decades ago it wasn't in our interest to take him out. Have you ever seen this video of Donald Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein? Rumsfeld stated, paraphrasing here, that other than human rights abuses, Iraq and the U.S. have similar goals.

What has changed between the 1980s and 2002 is not Saddam's human rights abuses, but the strategic advantage of his oil reserves and his power over the Middle East (esp. Iran). I don't know where you were in 2002 and 2003, but Bush, Cheney, Rice, Wolfowitz, and Rumsfeld did not tell us that we needed to take out Saddam because of human rights violations (though they were mentioned); no, the purpose of our invasion was to "stop global terror" and prevent Saddam from getting "WMDs." These have since proven to be falsehoods and lies. Earlier this year the Pentagon said that there was no discernible link OF ANY KIND between 9/11 and Iraq (and Saddam's connections with Al Qaeda were strenuous at best).

Between the misrepresentation of the reasons for war and the utter mishandling of the war itself (causing a multitude of death and displacement, and the entire collapse of Iraqi culture, AND allowing Al Qaeda to actually ENTER Iraq, where it had not been present before) I do not believe that it is unfair to say that the Iraq war has been a cause of "terror" in the most basic definition of the word. I do not believe Bush is a "terrorist" anymore than I believe that Saddam planned 9/11.

3. "At least the Iraqi's may actually have a future that is 50xs more free than they ever had under an EVIL despicable man like Saddam."

You are right. Things will one day be better for them. The way we entered into and handled the conflict, however, has made things terrible in a different way, and they will stay that way for some time (no drinking water, no electricity, young boys being recruited by Islamist factions, suicide bombings, etc etc).

4. "your vile and disgustingly ignorant anti-American filth."

I call on the forces of reason and Christian brotherhood to indict this statement as a mean-spirited and inappropriate lie. There is nothing anti-American about mourning deaths of evil people, or people who belong to different countries or ideologies, nor is it anti-American to question America's foreign policy.

5. "As it stands it is trash and spits on what this day about which is NOT to spew your liberal garbage."

I did not know that 9/11 was about me NOT saying what I thought. This post was hardly about Iraq at all. I predicted that you would attach yourself to the two sentences you disagreed with and completely ignore the rest. By being unable, in every way, to see another person's viewpoint, and by attacking me so virulently, you are attacking the entire premise of American democracy.

6. "Obviously you cannot do that and have to sprinkle your disgust for America and hatred for President Bush."

I am not disgusted with America, nor do I hate President Bush. It would be more accurate to say that I am disgusted with President Bush. I hope that your blind faith in and unquestioning regard for one man, simply because he is "President," lasts into Obama's presidency, but I know it will not.

7. "As always you may infuriate me and I will get harsh (Like here), but I see it more as tough love."

I am sorry to say this, Sophia, because I consider you a friend. However, what you have posted here is not tough love, it is easy hate. You are not wisely or fairly criticizing my comments, nor are you presenting your point of view as having greater logic than mine. You are simply saying to me that if I disagree with this President then I am anti-American.

If America was about everyone being united in IDENTICAL thought and action, we would be a dictatorship (like Iraq!). Instead, America is about uniting in differences, healthy debate amongst a multitude of views, yet always making sure that we keep the ideals of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" alive. I do not believe we have done that since 9/11, so I believe I am being patriotic in being CRITICAL of our current President. If you disagree, that is fair enough, but do not attack my views as unpatriotic simply because they do not conform to your idea of patriotism.

I would appreciate it if you did not comment on my blogs any more, at least until you begin to accept my different perspective.

I don't know if you noticed, but this entire blog was about mourning death. I want to be true to the memory of 9/11 and the human evil that it represents throughout the world and throughout history. I believe the U.S. has done some evil since 9/11, perhaps inadvertently, perhaps not. I believe the U.S. has always been imperfect, from the forming of the Constitution, to the Civil War, to WWII, Korea, Vietnam, etc etc etc. We have always had blind spots and made mistakes. Yet we would be unpatriotic to ignore them, rather than label any criticism as "anti-American."

I am glad you did not post this on 9/11, for it would surely have ruined my day. As it was, I got to read the comic book, re-read the poems, scripture, and essay that I talked about above, listen to a lot of Philip Glass, and enjoy the great things that America has afforded me: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It was a good, sad, fruitful day. I hope you had the same.