Tuesday, April 8, 2008

The MySpace Self-Portrait


If you spend any time on MySpace you know that our current youth generation (which I'm only barely growing out of) is obsessed with taking photos of ourselves holding our cameras in mirrors. After looking at the above photo (which breaks the norms of this genre, something I will get into at the end of this post), I began wondering WHY we do it, and why MySpace is the forum for this type of self-portrait.

Please note: I'm not going to provide examples of this type of photography since it would require me to violate someone's (very public) private life. Also, I feel icky looking at strangers' MySpace pages.

The first answer to the question of "why" is functional and simple: we desire self-portraits for MySpace so we can show people what we look like in a creative way, and one way to do that is to take our cameras into our bathrooms and snap photos with the camera visible. Sometimes we use flash to create a blinding light that looks "neat." As for motivation, there's not much more than that.

When examined, though, I think this new genre can be seen as a reflexive/modernist impulse born from an individualistic and self-centered media-driven society. To begin, it is reflexive in that it is a way to acknowledge that the person who took the photo and the person in the photo are the same. This reveals the most important element of any photograph, that is, the reason the photo was taken at all. Since this question of "what is this photo about" is almost always answered with "the person taking the photo," that makes it an individualistic impulse in my mind. MySpace itself is built entirely for self-creation and -expression, and a photo that self-consciously declares "I took this myself" fits in perfectly. A close relative to this is the holding-the-camera-as-far-away-as-possible self-portrait.

And if this genre of self-portrait is reflexive by drawing attention to itself as a created art, then it goes without saying that it is modernist. It envelopes the very act of photography into its subject matter, and forefronts the instant digital world-cum-gallery that allowed it to exist. Notice too the highly manipulated and artificial poses reflecting the self-interest and self-promotion of the subject; thanks to digital cameras, we can take this photo over and over till we get it right. Mirrors are an essential part of this genre as well, as digital photos and mirrors are both ways for us to look at ourselves. A photograph isn't really a person, but a photo of a mirror is even less so. In this sense, the MySpace self-portrait requires conceptual thinking; the viewer must subconsciously compute the relationship between the subject, the camera, and the mirror (the latter of which is often not visible, unlike in our subject photo).

And on a final level, this form of photo also conveniently reveals the type of camera we are using, which makes it perhaps a materialist impulse as well, especially considering those people who take pictures of their abs or their bikinis in this fashion (wealth and beauty, what a combo).

The photo above masterfully undoes some of the basics of this formula, replacing specific self with a generic self by obscuring the subject/photographer's face. This forces our focus towards the location (the car) and the urban landscape. The photographer seems more concerned with capturing the landscape than herself, yet she is still the dominating force in the photo. Though it is possible she took many versions of this photo thanks to digital photography, the windswept hair and unposed face indicate that this was not a glamor shot. She has not photographed an exceptionally beautiful part of this urbania either, making even the roller coasters that sweep through the photo look mundane. Since we are leaving this location behind, the photo acts like a dour version of a tourist photo at the end of a trip, signaling the farewell to a location that once may have offered excitement. Now the photographer merely sits there, recording the event, retaining the individualism and consciously challenging us with the act of recording. It's quite a step up from the typical MySpace self-portrait.

Here's my own pathetic attempt to join this genre, taken with a Macintosh computer's built-in EyeSight camera:


Yeah.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think a far simpler explanation is that it is a fad and will die down. :)

leila said...

Heck yes I'm the dominating force.

RABicle said...

More like idiots who don't know how to use their autotimer.

Kendra said...

Goodness, I think you've pondered this subject far too thoroughly.
Kendra

Anonymous said...

I'm glad everyone wants the simple explanantion....lol. but we're pretty good at readers-digesting everything right? we have to be in this age where we have all the information we want at our fingertips :)

Anonymous said...

who cares.

Evan T. Burchfield said...

Dear last anonymous commenter on my blog:

I am so glad you hated my meandering blog so much that leaving a negative comment was worth your time. I'm glad too that your hate has been transformed into thoughtful criticism and intelligent conversation. Your words are challenging and have reshaped my perception of the Internet, MySpace, and aesthetics.

Please note that I'm happy to see that your well-reasoned comments are in no way credited to you, nor do you have to defend them. I understand that posting on the "Internet" is SCARY and I wouldn't want you to have to suffer any (god forbid) CRITICISM for something you write. No, just putting your words out there is enough, and hiding is not at all cowardly.

One thing I didn't quite get in your post, though: when you say "who cares" I'm not exactly sure what you're asking. Perhaps you mean to ask "who cares what anonymous turd-hats on the Internet have to say about Evan's blog?" If that was what you meant, let me tell you the answer: no one does.

Die in a fire,
Evan T. Burchfield

Christin said...

Myspace is very self centered.
To be really honest...for me, I take pictures of myself because I feel really crappy looking and I try to make some view of me look decent. It usually doesn't work so then I end up making weird faces and dealing with it.
Now I have a cute Micaiah to pepper with pictures.

Michael said...

Oh my, Evan, that wasn't very nice. Now, should he ever return, you will have confirmed his suspicions that you are an *ahem-coughcough* hole. Whereas, should he never return, your well thought out comment will have been wasted.

To be honest, I think the commenter has a valid point, even if he doesn't realize it. Who does care? And I'm totally serious. So many people, when I try to have some sort of conversation about something that really, if you think about it, doesn't make a difference in the long run, so many of my friends just say, "who cares?". Who cares whether bad art is still art? Who cares whether The Kite Runner is awesome or sucks? Who cares about half the stuff that we talk about other than ...us? Is it really worth talking about?

These are questions I have thought about because most of my friends really don't care. I enjoy discussing these things, but is it really worth my time? Does it really make a difference? A large part of me thinks it is worth discussing these "meaningless" things. But, I am curious to hear your thoughts.

In this situation, this is your blog, and you can post whatever you want on it. So, I totally agree with all of your comments to the other commenter.

EPIC BURN!!!!

Die in a fire,
Michael

Christin said...

"Die in a fire"...funny but harsh. It's like all the mean things I think about people I pass on the street or something...They crack me up and then afterwards I feel terrible.

Jasonfrasierhalliwell said...

I use Myspace myself and I never really understood why we all take pictures like that (camera , mirror and person). I think what you said was a really clever analysis , Are you a therapist ? You could certainly give them a run for there money ! :)
Take care.